It seems anomalous official to take precedence over other Officers who receive higher salaries?
M. Bramston
9 April
I think W. Deane ought to take precedence of M. Lockhart & M. Mitchell Innes according to seniority in the service.
C.P.L.
M. Lucas.
9. Ap.
Is M. Deane going to retire shortly? There had been correspondence about his friends.
M. Bramston
1.9.4
I think not since 88/9. Su 12123-89: 20393.88
C.P.L.
11 A/
The precedence should be settled once and for all in both Councils and can then be passed by despatch.
Bermuda, Sierra Leone, Gambia, Gold Coast, Lagos.
Recently, we asserted in the Instructions of 1888?
Riet ap!!
M. Adrian
Is there any precedent for fixing precedence by despatch?
13/4
J. Bramston
I do not think there is any similar precedent because the clause in the Royal Instructions was only introduced in 1883, and no case has arisen under them with Colonies in which it exists.
It seems to me that the object of the clause is to enable the Secretary of State to assign special precedence, but of course, it should be done in the Queen's name.
Jod 13 April
So provided by dispatch - the words do not limit the mode of assigning precedence. In writing or speaking refer to arts. 4 & 6 of the Instructions.
13/4
Drafted for consideration
Kult abis
13
Page 193
ན ོ
perdener
it seems
aw
alove
though anomaly official to take
for precedener
in the Executive
Council ove other Officers
who receive higher salaries?
M-Bramston
Fod 9 Aprilfige
I think W. Deane ought to fatte precedence of M- Lockhout & Mi Mitchell Innes
of
#
and M. Lockhart
M. Mitchell Innes; this would be
Paccording to seniority
CPL
M. Lucas.
in the service.
9. Ap.
Is M. Deane going & Utire Shortly - Spancine There had been
Coresponder atmt his frensim –
M. Bramston
1.9.4
I think not since 88/9 Su 12123-89: 20393.88
C.PL
11 A/
the Precedence should torvereitas Uncheces supperts in both Counsels &
Can then be possied by despatch unin entste
Bermuda I Leone Sambia Fuld Crack Lagos.
so we may Recently, essegh userted in
uld Coast Distructions
Du 1883- Joa
the Instructions of 6888 ?
Riet ap!!
M. adrian
Is there
any precedent for fixing Inecedorm of despatite
M.13/4
J. Bramston
I do not think there is
193
is any
similar precedent because the
the Akong
clause in
Jistrictions
was I trunks only introduced Into Royal Instinctions in 1880n3. case that Iam awon
and no
in
of has arisen under them with Colonies in which it exists. It seems
ctral the object of
to me
The
Clause is to enable the Sof to assign special precedence bey Derpated but of course.
it should be done on Queen's name.
Jod 13 April 191
So pround by dispatch _ the words do out limit the Mod of assigning prendenes - In writing or shores refer to arts. 4 216 of the Instructims-
13/4
Draftatown for consideration
Kult abis
13
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.